How do we move logical shorthands forward?
There are several proposals, but one major road block
We’re trying to make progress on shorthand syntax for CSS logical properties. But the path forward depends on where we hope to be a decade from now.
CSS Grid Layout is shaping up to be the layout tool we’ve always wanted on the web. How can we use it to start creating interesting layouts?
I couldn’t be more excited about CSS grid layout. For far too many years we’ve been dealing with CSS solutions that were never made for the layouts we have been creating. Working with tables then floats and positioning have conditioned us to avoid anything outside of these standard patterns we’ve come to settle upon. But designers and CSS developers can soon rejoice when the CSS Grid Layout Module hits browsers.
In the meantime, Flexbox has been a great addition to our CSS Toolbox, giving us a way to lay content out easier than before. Remember when vertical centering used to be a huge ordeal? There are a number of issues that are “Solved by Flexbox,” but it is still not a complete grid solution.
If you haven’t used Flexbox yet, I highly suggest studying this CodePen demo:
See the Pen Flexbox playground by @enxaneta on CodePen.
Flexbox is great for single direction elements but lacks the ability to create structure on both x and y axis’. A container with display: flex; can either go horizontally or vertically as selected by the flex-direction property.
Well, CSS Grid Layout is in the far distant future. It doesn’t have much
browser support at the moment so if you want to use it on a production
site you may want to use Feature Queries. By wrapping your code in an
@supports
conditional, it will check to see if the browser has support
for the property/value pair in the parentheses, and if so, will use what
is inside the @supports brackets. If the browser doesn’t have support
for display: grid or if the browser
doesn’t even know what Feature Queries are, then it ignores the block of
code.
.container {
display: flex;
@supports ( display: grid ) {
display: grid;
}
}
Currently, Feature Queries are supported in most browsers except Internet Explorer and Opera Mini:
Grid line The lines that create the grid, separating the grid cells.
Grid track The horizontal or vertical space between two grid lines, often spanning multiple grid cells.
Grid cell A single unit of the grid made from the space between four grid lines.
Grid area A group of space between four grid lines, often containing a group of grid cells. Grid areas can be named in CSS.
Over the next few months we will be writing more about CSS Grid Layout. In the meantime, CSS-Tricks posted a guide from Chris House that explains each of the below properties in great detail.
I’ve been creating a few demos in CodePen using Grid and it has been exciting to see the flexibility we will have once this rolls out. I encourage you to start experimenting on your own as well.
See the Pen CSS Grid Layout Demo by @stacy on CodePen.
In the CodePen demo below, you’ll see we start with floats then wrap
everything else in @supports ( display: flex ) {}
or
@supports ( display: grid ) {}
. Within the first Flexbox conditional,
we over-write the float, max-width, and clearing properties we defined
for the older browsers.
See the Pen CSS Grid Layout with float and flexbox fallbacks by @stacy on CodePen.
What types of layouts can we create with this more flexible system? I would love for some very experimental design to start taking place. I can hear the sighs from usability experts everywhere so let me be clear, I am not saying that we need to create crazy, chaotic designs with unpredictable navigation patterns. I am only asking how we can explore and create new ways to layout out content that are still intuitive but perhaps different from what we’ve always done in the past.
There have been a number of wonderful conference talks from CSS Grid advocates including Rachel Andrew, Christopher Wright and Jen Simmons demonstrating the how, why and what is possible when it comes to CSS Grid Layout. If you have any resources to share with us, we’d love to hear from you, too!
There are several proposals, but one major road block
We’re trying to make progress on shorthand syntax for CSS logical properties. But the path forward depends on where we hope to be a decade from now.
Can we get this process unstuck?
The CSS Working Group recently resolved to add a size
shorthand for setting both the width
and height
of an element. Many people asked about using it to set the ‘logical’ inline-size
and block-size
properties instead. But ‘logical shorthands’ have been stalled in the working group for years. Can we…
It’s not just a shorthand for anchor()
position-area
might be my favorite part of the CSS Anchor Positioning spec, with a ton of features packed in to make things just… work. But there’s no magic here, just a few key parts that work well.